PROPERS: PROPER
19, YEAR A
TEXT: MATTHEW 18:21-35
PREACHED AT ST. PAUL’S
CHURCH, MAGNOLIA SPRINGS, ON SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2017.
ONE SENTENCE: The Christian ideal is to forgive generously, but not to subject
oneself to abuse.
The great writer, F. Scott
Fitzgerald, once said, “The
test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in
mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function.”
I guess a good, contemporary test of that principle would
be if someone would be able to cheer for Auburn at the same time they cheer for
Alabama.
Or, more personally for me, if I could cheer for LSU at
the same time I cheer for Ole Miss.
It’s a pretty tall order.
But, F. Scott Fitzgerald’s principle is a sound one. And it poses a challenge.
So much of political discourse today is based on binary
choices – either this way, or that. That
tendency to see either/or as opposed
to both/and has led to the political
tension we experience in society today.
It plays out, with terrible consequences, on so many levels.
It is not just a matter of compromise, though it is certainly that. But it is more a matter of being able to see
the value in both approaches and adapting
one’s behavior to reflect that insight.
Nowhere is that tendency more used than in looking at
scripture. People of various persuasions
tend to use intellectual sleight-of-hand
called proof-texting to bolster their
arguments. They will pick one verse
which supports their argument and use that as conclusive evidence that their
position is the position of scripture.
By doing so, they may ignore the overall arch of
scripture or additional verses which would counter their argument.
That was not
the mindset of the Semitic people who bequeathed us the Bible. They were able to see the complexity of the
issues they confronted. The rabbis who wrote extensively in early days were
willing to debate and argue the balance
of conflicting perspectives. And they would value each.
Seeking the mind of God may be much like looking at the
world through a kaleidoscope than through a telescope.
Perhaps nowhere is that tension more in evidence than
today’s gospel lesson. And perhaps no
lesson is more misapplied.
The tension is between our Lord’s call for generous
forgiveness and well-grounded need to protect oneself from injurious
behavior. How do we do both?
It is possible.
How does an abused wife both forgive her spouse and
protect herself?
How does a victim of crime forgive the perpetrator while
expecting consequences from the state?
How does a spouse who has been betrayed let go of the
betrayal while not allowing additional disloyalty?
You can write your own script. In fact, in your mind, you probably have.
+ + +
It has to do with the nature of forgiveness – what it
means and what it does not mean.
As you know, for many years I was Canon to the Ordinary
in the Diocese of Mississippi. Both
during those years and even before, I had to deal with situations involving
clergy who had done grossly inappropriate things.
As the acts became public and the Bishop was prepared to
sanction the priest, we were always
reminded of the gospel passage from today – no matter how grievous or
inappropriate the act. “Just forgive and move on,” was the
frequent request. I called it “forgiveness
lite.”
As you likely know, forgiveness is not that simple. Forgiveness is not about enabling the person to repeat the behavior. Forgiveness is not about letting bygones be
bygones. Forgiveness is not about acting like nothing ever happened. Forgiveness is not about allowing the person to have
the same authority or power that he or she had once before.
In each of those cases that I dealt with, the Bishop
sanctioned the priest – sometimes quite significantly. And, at the same time, he may have forgiven
the priest. They are not mutually
exclusive.
Divine forgiveness comes from God – and it is God’s
nature, we know from scripture, to be ready to forgive. We do not control that profound movement of
the spirit.
However, we do determine what we do.
Forgiveness, from the human perspective, is about letting
go and moving forward, as individuals who have been offended or injured. It is about finding new life. It is about letting go of the burdens of the
past and their ability to control or affect us.
Forgiveness, I have experienced, is a gift of grace. As the old saying goes about grace, forgiveness is like grits – you don’t order
it, it just comes. It may come when you least expect it. It may wash over you like the tide. It may be a sense that you have suddenly
become unburdened from the past.
Jesus says today that we are to forgive seventy-seven times. Other translations make that seventy times seven – or 490 times! A way to interpret that, I think, is to
recognize that you may need to forgive a single offense many, many times before
it has no more power over you.
A way to look at this is found in a meditation I read
many years ago. It tells the story of a
man who was betrayed. He took the
offense very seriously. His resentment –
which can be defined as anger with dust
on it – grew deeper and deeper.
Over
a period of years, that bitterness was transformed into rocks in his heart. The
weight of those rocks of resentment caused him to stoop over – and he became a
bent, bitter old man.
An
angel appeared to him and told him that if he would forgive the offense, the
stones in his heart would begin to disappear.
He protested – he still felt righteous indignation! “Nothing
can change the past,” he said. “What
was done has been done.”
The
angel responded, “Yes, that is true. But you can change the future.”
Day-by-day,
the man practiced forgiveness. And as
time went by, the stones disappeared from his heart. He became light-hearted and stood erect. He had let go of the past. He found new life.
Forgiveness
is about letting go of the past, and not
allowing it to control your future.
It is not about letting bygones be
bygones or acting as if what happened
never really happened.
A
faithful Christian can both
forgive and protect oneself
from further harm. Both are good and right.
As F.
Scott Fitzgerald might have observed, they
are opposed ideas which we can hold onto and still function.
No comments:
Post a Comment